A few months ago, Jinger and Jeremy Vuolo and their two girls traveled back to Arkansas to spend time with family, with a brief stop in Dallas to visit Justin and Claire. On their first day in Arkansas, Jinger met up with her mom and sisters for a girls day, while Jeremy--with Evangeline in tow--went to work with Austin. The video that the Vuolos posted (link below) includes Abbie, Kendra, and Lauren, whose appearances on social media are limited.
Why is it OK for Jinger to tape and post other people's kids, but nobody's allowed to post hers?
ReplyDeletePerhaps she got permission? Was the video from a public place like a restaurant? You risk your image in public. Why are you in their business? They don’t need others mad on their behalf. Did the tabloid get permission to post the images from Jinger? They all raise the kids different and have different concerns about publicity.
DeleteIt’s strange rules for sure but as long as everybody is being respectful of each other’s wishes.
DeleteMaybe she asked permission first. You know, let the parents make the call for their own kids.
DeleteBecause she had the parents permission
DeleteI'm sure she asked permission. Maybe that's why it took so long for the video to come out with all the editing and asking she had to do.. who knows.
DeleteMaybe the others don't play the silly game of "I don't show my kids! That's why I show them all the time from the back!"
DeleteOP this is ridiculous. There is a thing called permission. It also explains why it took a while for the video to come out. Stop trying to find the littlest things.
DeleteHa - there are her kids in a video again, from the back again. After she's said she's keeping them out of the public eye.
Delete@1:54 No, there's a thing called sticking to your word. If you say you're keeping your kids off social media, don't go around showing them from the back all the time. And don't show everyone else's kids, because the same logic for why you're keeping yours offline should apply to them too. They are just as worthy of being protected as yours are. Or they should be.
Delete4:21 she has addressed how she films and takes pictures of them already. She is their mother. Why are you so press over something you misheard?
DeleteJinger needs to realize that her attempts not to show her kids are not working. We've seen exactly what they look like from all those video and photo glimpses. It's a lost cause at this point.
DeleteJinger can show her kids how she pleases. Some celebs do the same thing and I don't see nobody complaining. Stop acting like you are entitled to their children because that's what it really boils down to here. When they wasn't showing their kids at all, you guys still was throwing a tantrum. But why? You know what that makes you sound like?
DeleteI don't know about anyone else but I have NO interest in seeing their kids. Especially if they've said they don't want to show them!! Entitled? No siree. It's silly actions on their part.
DeletePeople do think they are entitled to these Duggars.
DeleteSo why is it still a secret here that Lauren has had #3? I don't see Lauren demanding that video be taken down so nobody knows she was pregnant last winter. Nor did she have the Christmas video removed where her second kid was outed. No reason any more not to update that birthday list.
ReplyDeleteWho posted the Christmas video?
DeleteLauren and Si never fully stepped back from public. They are just not ready to fully come back.
Delete@7:15 There was a Christmas video from the big house. I forget who posted it. There were stockings with Lauren's 2 kids' names on them.
Delete@July 6th, 3:23pm. As friends of the Duggars, Lily & Ellie have probably promised the various Duggar family members that they won't share any information without having permission to do so. Thus, Lily & Ellie can't update the birthday list without breaking a promise. I would also love to see a more accurate birthday list, but I appreciate that Lily & Ellie are sticking to whatever promise they made to the Duggars.
Delete@3:13 If that's the case then ALL birthdays should be removed. Nobody's privacy is more important than anyone else's. It's also silly to have some kids listed there but not others in the same family. Makes no sense. Those family pictures are invasive too by that standard.
Delete5:31 Unless they just haven't updated their website. It takes a while.
DeleteInteresting. It's like Jinger's book never happened.
ReplyDeleteI believe, this was before Jinger's book came out.
DeleteJinger's book was actually mostly positive toward her parents and family. She spoke highly of her parents but explained why--to her, specifically--Gothard's teachings were harmful. I feel she stopped short of directly saying her parents were wrong in following it. She gave at least one example of when her parents pointed her in the right direction despite Gothard's rules, and overall emphasized that she appreciated her upbringing but as she got older realized that a lot of Gothard's "additions" didn't actually follow the Bible. I don't know if her parents read it or not, but she made a pretty good case of why some of the teachings were wrong so hopefully they learned something from it. But she spoke highly of them so I doubt there was much of a rift as a result of it. And given how many of the girls were wearing pants in the photo from the girls' day, I think a lot of them agree with her!
DeleteI found Jinger's book to be highly respectful of her parents. She has found true freedom in Jesus Christ and is compelled to speak up, especially to set the record straight on what was said in the book she "authored" with her sisters. The Bible commands the Church (the body of Christ) to share the TRUE Gospel, not man-made Gothard rules, and that is what she has tried to do. I give her a lot of credit.
DeleteDid Kendra have another baby? and is Lauren pregnant? enquiring minds want to know :)
ReplyDeleteKendra did have a boy last year. Lauren did have a baby (probably a boy) earlier this year. That video was filmed late winter/very early spring. You can tell by the trees.
DeletePeople in Arkansas probably follow the law and drive better than big city people
Delete4:13 "Big City People" don't let their unlicensed teenagers drive around the property in junker cars and construction equipment. I remember when Anna was scared to pieces to drive in DC. That itself creates a hazard for others.
DeleteBig City people kids are in the highest percentage to cause a wreck from careless driving and texting while driving. Seems they are not different than those country kids.
DeleteSorry 11:10, it's rural roads that are and have historically been the most deadly in this country.
DeleteAnother slack law in Arkansas. You can ride loose in the back of a vehicle (like Austin) without a seatbelt. I will never understand why this family doesn't seem to care about safety. At least Jeremy eventually kind of put his seat belt on (without the shoulder part).
ReplyDeleteIts like that everyone actually.
Delete@1:53 No, a lot of states have laws about everyone in the car needing to be buckled up, and nobody in the back where there's no seat.
DeleteWow, you'd get pulled over here if you had someone tucked away in the back of your SUV like that!
Delete? There's no visit to the big house. Just s coffee shop visit with everyone who can go is likely cause the book happened.
ReplyDeleteI noticed that too and I didn't see Jim Bob in the video.
DeleteIn Joy's video about Jinger's visit, Jim Bob was seen at a guet together that was had for Jinger. If Jim Bob was mad at jinger, why would he go to a get together for her?
Delete@10:37 Likely he came for appearances sake only. If you notice, there were no visits to the Big House.
DeleteCan you imagine the Bates daughters writing books and appearing all over tv and then in a documentary about how they were raised in a cult and how terrorized they were all the time and then posting a video showing themselves visiting the family like they didn't say these things. There is no accountability for their actions. Them Bates kids not only would never do this to their family, neither would the siblings put up with it if one of the Bates kids lost their minds and caused all this hate online that the Duggar family is getting. The nerve of them 2 girls! They are really full of themselves! Gil and Kelly get respect because they don't tolerate that kind of disrespect.
ReplyDeleteThe Bates family are not near as strict as the Duggars. The Bates kids might have gotten paid for their time on the TV show. We don’t really know. A lot of the Batss women have dducation and some have jobs.
DeleteDon't ever be fooled by intentional impressions left via social media, YouTube, or TV... doesn't matter if it's the Duggars, Bates, or your neighbor down the street.
DeleteA couple differences - first, Gil is still on the board of the IBLP. I keep hoping he's there to help steer it to a better place and bring some sense to it, but I'm probably wrong on that. Second, the Bates didn't really have the same sort of explosive, family-destroying controversy that probably made it a little easier to step out and explain that some things clearly didn't go according to plan. Like, that fact was already pretty obvious based on Josh, so taking a further step to explain where some of the things went wrong wasn't as huge as it would be for the Bates. In fact, I think Jinger was actually very gentle on her parents in the book and probably felt like she was even defending them and explaining why they did what they did at the time. Finally, I tend to think the Bates figured out sooner to loosen the reins on their kids from those rules and regulations to keep them from rebelling to the same degree. They've showed a lot more physical contact with future spouses, and dressed in pants for years. They never seemed quite as rigidly "programmed" as the Duggars, to be honest, so I think it's a very different situation.
Delete8:43 we don't know their personal lives. A lot of the times people who complain about women not having jobs don't have jobs themselves or are unhappy they have to work. It really is none of your business and it doesn't effect you at all.
Delete1:52 People who post their lives on TV or social media are leaving themselves open to comments and opinions. BTW, no one was complaining about anyone not having a job. It was simply an observation someone made about the Duggar women, which is pretty much based on what they've shown the public and talked about regarding their IBLP theology- women are supposed to be housewives and mothers. Furthering one's education or having a career outside the home are discouraged. Furthermore, comments made shouldn't affect you at all.
Delete9:33 people who never been on TV who over share their lives and pictures on social media is subjected to the same treatment in your logic? So let me do the same to you. You are using it as an excuse to be a bully.
Delete@6:09 How is stating facts in line with bullying? The Duggar daughters are taught that women are supposed to be housewives and mothers and they're not encouraged to further their education or have a career outside the home. That's what their "reality" TV show was all about.
Delete6:03 Its how you are going about it. And if the Duggars was regular people, would you still feel the same? Did you go to college and have a career? You want to push second education on people, help them pay for it.
Delete@5:26 We DO help pay for it. Sixty percent of states have at least community college tuition-free, funded by state tax dollars.
Delete@5:26 - I'm 6:03 and, yes I went to college, earned a Master's degree and had a professional career for over 35 years and am now enjoying retirement. I am also married and raised a family. My comment was pushing anything on anyone, but simply stated facts about the Duggars. They have followed IBLP doctrine, which discourages women from having a post-secondary education and teaches them that they should be housewives and mothers. It was the family pushing that ideology on TV, not me.
Delete5:26 Chances are your tax money is paying for someone else's kid to go to college, either directly, or by keeping tuition down.
Delete9:31 but you are pushing it just like the Dyggars. I don't think people realize them saying they need to go to college and have careers is also pushing them just like what their parents did to them.
Delete1:20 yep how do you think all the student loans got paid off? How sad.
DeleteOh my goodness how are Jill and Jinger in this video laughing and having a good ole time with some of their family after all the hate they stirred up that their family and friends are dealing with now. This is beyond crazy! You wouldn't get away with that in my family. lol
ReplyDeleteBecause their siblings probably see the truth now. Jill and Jinger has the right to speak out. Stop silencing victims.
DeleteYep.. Jill really shamed them
DeleteJeremy is so disrespectful and acting LA snobby back in Arkansas. "I thought Austin was more of a Home Depot guy" - what kind of put-down remark was that?
ReplyDeleteI know. Jeremeeeee.
Delete8:32AM: I'm sure Jeremy is just kidding around. I think he's impressed with Austin with all the houses he builds, the talent he has, and his work ethic.
DeleteJeremy sure didn't seem thrilled to be following Austin around at his job all day. Sorry Jeremy - not everyone is a white collar preacher and "famous celebrity co-author" the way you are. Some have to get their hands dirty to make a buck.
Delete12:46 how did you get that??? Lol.
DeleteI hope Jeremy didn't get his sneakers dirty!!
Delete@4:19 All the more reason to buy new ones.
DeleteI like Austin. He's a man's man. Jeremy is a bit too city and Foo Foo like lol.
Delete@4:11. At least Jeremy doesn't shoot and kill innocent animals. Also, calling him "foo foo?" Seriously?!
Delete4:11 What's a "man's man" or "foo-foo", exactly?
DeleteThere is nothing wrong with Austin or Jeremy. You guys are so immature.
Delete@ 5:05- you're barking up the wrong tree honey.. Austin hunts...so what?? Go to PETA meetings and tell them all about it
DeleteJeremy is a pretty boy lol.. very LA ish. Austin is more down to earth
DeleteWhy the hate on Jeremy so bad on this site? Oh I know why lol. You guys need a break from the computer.
Delete@5:24 It's not just here. Jeremy's continual pictures of his clothes, his shoes, his pens, his watches, his - oh yeah, forgot he had a wife for a second with all those other things - bother a lot of people. It's definitely not your usual "preacher" lifestyle, and it comes across as pretentious.
DeleteI love to see jealous Jeremy comments
DeleteJealous? A million times no. We should all look to Jeremy for examples of why NOT to be materialistic and if you must be, why NOT to share that with the world.
Delete2:20 just because it posts pictures of his shoes does not make him materialistic. A lot of those shoes are PR that is sent to a lot of people on social media. How about practice what you preach by getting off your computer or phone for awhile.
DeleteIt's very good that Jinger was able to spend some time with her family.
ReplyDeleteit looks like Kendra has 4 children now. Did we miss a birth and pregnancy announcement?
ReplyDeleteYes, they tried to keep him under wraps when he was born, but if you take a baby out in public in Arkansas, the entire internet knows the next day.
DeleteThere was no "pregnancy announcement", she just had another baby and they said nothing.
DeleteJim Bob must have his children locked into contracts so that only the in-laws can be on camera.
ReplyDeleteThey said on the docuseries that in order for his children to fet money owed to them for their work on the series, they had to sign a lifelong contract with him.
DeleteI think that is moot now that the show no longer exists. I'm not sure exactly what the hold Jim Bob has over his children but it's very strong.
DeleteAnon 2:51 I don't think Jim Bob is this dictator type person that people try to make him out to be. Him and Michelle provided their children with a Godly, fun-filled, adventurous childhood. They got to see the world, had huge celebrations for birthdays and holidays and weddings. They got them involved in ministries and taught them how to serve God and others. They lived in a huge beautiful home and had a small store size pantry filled to the brim with food. Because of the way they were raised and the amount of children in the family they became a household name. People including myself were inspired by their wholesome lifestyle. That wasn't easy for the parents to raise them that way. They were in a stricter type denomination where modesty and integrity and a love for God and others was a priority which isn't a bad thing considering how most people are raising their kids. Then they grew up and two of the girls clearly got around a lot of worldly type people and decided to rebel against the parents and all that they use to believe in. After all the dishonor and now the horrible things being said about their parents in the media they think its ok to make money off of what they did. If they feared their Dad so much they would never have done this to him. I don't think he was mean, I think he might have spoiled them too much. Try pulling this stuff with Gil Bates or my Dad. lol. We are loyal to our parents.
Delete2:51 its something called fear.
Delete@2:57 How do you know what kind of a father Jim Bob has been or what kind of a person he is when the cameras aren't rolling? Everything shown on their TV show was orchestrated to present them as a perfect family and himself as a perfect dad.
Delete2:57 -- Their parents taught them to follow man-made rules (down to hair style and length) written by a man many girls have accused of sexual abuse -- Bill Gothard. That is the opposite of Christianity. I'm glad at least some of the children have woken up to appreciate the true Gospel and their freedom in Jesus Christ.
DeleteI agree 2:57. Who cares if the girls were made to wear dresses? His house his rules! Now that they're adults, they can live their lives and stop complaining..
DeleteI agree OP. They got out in the world and decided their parents were "mean" and are rebelling.. i saw Jinger in a picture wearing ripped jeans.. she's a mom for heavens sake! Teens wear that kind of stuff..
Delete@6:34 & 6:43 You obviously don't understand that the IBLP indoctrination isn't just about controlling what women wear. It's a cult that leaves women vulnerable to abuse by controlling males and protects the abusers.
DeleteI never understood the appeal of ripped jeans. They just seem ugly.
Delete12:38 I cringe when I see jean skirts, especially the long ones flapping about the ankles. They look so drab and dowdy.
Delete8:03- the Duggar girls claimed to have chosen to wear their hair that way and dress the way they used to. They shouldn't have written about such things if they didn't believe in it.
DeleteThey're wearing the very things they used to say "Nike" about. I hope they realize now that they shouldn't have been so judgemental of others' clothes.
Delete@6:20 The Duggar girls wrote those things when they were still under the authority of their father. Of course they would be instructed to write what they did.
DeleteSurely none of you believe the girls themselves wrote any part of that book. It was written by people acting with the adults in charge, for marketing the brand purposes. Who would buy this book? Viewers, who expected the book to match the show.
DeleteI don't understand with all that happened and was covered up, that people get upset if victims want to tell their story to try to give other victims encouragement to seek help and to let them know they are not the only ones to go through the situations they are facing. It's like victim blaming. That's why a lot of things go unreported.
ReplyDeleteTrue, 9:42. And kids need to be empowered and know it's OK to speak up. Abusive adults can be completely intimidating. That's how the troubles continue...
DeleteOn the recent documentary with Jill and her cousin, it was revealed Bill kept up with a lot of things being said about him. I won't be surprised if this is the case. I don't see how anyone can defend these parents.
DeleteOh please 9:42.. they could have told their stories long before leaving the big house but instead had another series. If Jill was that upset, she could have been free to move out and get a job before pregnancy. But she didn't
Delete@6:45 You can't tell your story when you're under a contract and you have an NDA. You aren't free to leave either if you're under contract. Jim Bob had them all under contract. I wouldn't be surprised if there were still NDA's floating around out there too.
Delete6:45 Jill was under a TLC contract that JimBob controlled. She didn't have any choice in the matter. Jill stated that her parents forged her signature in some instances.
DeleteI gather this all took place prior to Jinger's book coming out. Somehow I don't think they're all quite so chummy now.
ReplyDeleteThis was after Jinger's book came out. People who have read Jinger's book say it mostly talks against Gothard
DeleteI think Jinger understands you are never to old to get caught up in a cult.
DeleteNice seeing many of the Duggar family getting together. God Bless.
ReplyDeleteJoan,Marion and Marilyn
Great that they get to spend time together. Hopefully no more docuseries for awhile...
ReplyDeleteI would love to know if Jenni will get married before Johanna.
ReplyDeleteWhy in the world are you thinking about teenagers getting married? They should be thinking about college and careers, not courtships!
DeleteI hope neither one of them is in any hurry to get married, will venture out on their own, get a good post-secondary education and experience some independence.
DeleteAt 18 they are adults and can choose their own paths.
DeleteGood grief. Jenni is what, 16? She is still a child. Let’s not wonder when she is getting married.
DeleteI'm all for marriage and babies, but sure get out in the working world a bit. I did and hated it. Glad I got to stay home and raise my kiddos
DeleteI hope they marry between 18 and 21 and become free.
Delete1:55, they’ll be trapped in a different way if they marry that young. They should go to college or work instead.
DeleteYou're not going to become "free" if you marry. You're going to go straight to obeying your husband and having kids. It's not even medically a good idea to have children before you're 23. Significantly greater chance of genetic defects before that age - new study just out - safest years are 23 to 32.
DeleteLooked at some of that study. The lead investigator “assumes” that below the age of 23, defects are related to lifestyle such as alcohol, smoking and drugs. While that would make sense I’m always a bit doubtful about research with assumptions.
Delete11:11- you don't understand what the concept of "obeying your spouse" means. As the head of the household, he has the final say, but you come to an agreement.
Delete@6:23 He has the final say.....which you must obey, even if you don't agree. You don't always come to a mutual agreement.
Delete9:17 marriage doesn't have to trap you. Abby went back to nursing btw.
Delete6:23 Apparently, you don't know what the concept of "obeying your spouse" means either. The husband has the final say, no matter if his wife agrees or not.
Delete5:00pm you obviously haven't read the Bible
DeleteI don't think neither of you all understand. The husband works and the wife takes care of the house. You expect to sit around and do your nails? Earn your keep and mop something lol
Delete@10:39 I see what you did there lol
DeleteIt is almost painful to read comments that praise JimBob and Michelle as terrific, Godly parents who are misunderstood victims of mistreatment by Jill and Jinger. I guess the TLC show did a good job of brainwashing a lot of people.
ReplyDelete8:55 pm: it’s ok to speculate. Some kids do marry at 16 and 17, just to get out of the house.
ReplyDeleteMaybe back in the 90s and earlier lol.
DeleteIt's really not like that because these days a lot of people can't even afford to live on their own with two incomes.
DeleteHere's hoping that Katey is enjoying her 25th Birthday!!!!!! (Posted by Here's hoping.)
ReplyDelete