Jinger and Jemrey Vuolo recently welcomed a group of family members to Los Angeles. The Seewalds, John and Abbie Duggar, and Jana and Stephen Wissmann traveled out to California for a short visit. While they were there, Jessa and Ben Seewald joined the Vuolos on their podcast. The Seewalds answer a number of questions, including their plans for the size of their family.
Wednesday, May 28, 2025
27 comments:
Thanks for leaving your comments! We answer as many of your questions as we can, but due to the number of comments we receive daily, we are unable to answer every one. Our aim is to post all points of view, but we do not post anything that is profane, insulting, derogatory, or in poor taste.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
When you have to film an interview with your sister and brother-in-law to answer personal questions you wanted to ask them, it's. time. to. hang. it. up.
ReplyDeleteI think many people are interested in the Duggar siblings...especially the older ones that were heavily covered in the show.
DeletePretty sure it's for their audience, not because Jeremy and Jinger can't ask them questions any other way.
DeleteHappy Birthday to Ben who turned 28 during him and Jessa’s visit to Calif.
Delete@ 3:59: Ben actually turned 30 this past May 19th, and not 28.
DeleteActually it was Jessa who turned 30 and wanted 10 kids by age 35. She is on track and plans well. She always was the goal-setter in the family. Good for her!
DeleteJessa will be 33 this November and Ben turned 30 this past may.
DeleteThis was a fun episode. I hope the other siblings will also do episodes. It would be fun to hear from Josiah and Lauren, Anna, how about Jim Bob and Michelle.
ReplyDeleteAnd why exactly would Jinger interview anybody who may likely be opposed to her worldview? And your assuming these people would want to be interviewed.
DeleteShe said she was hoping. I hope they do too. Doesn't matter whether you agree on everything. Who does? Be kind in your words. 😍
Delete@5:12 the poster assumed nothing. They stated it would be fun to hear from others in the family. I think when we converse with people of different viewpoints we learn...acceptance and tolerance.
DeleteI'd like to watch Jinger try to handle someone "opposed to her worldview." Maybe she'd learn that she and her family are in the minority with their outdated and prejudiced views. Jinger's "views" need to be expanded through exposure to and interaction with others. Her parents certainly didn't do that, and Jeremy isn't either.
Delete5:12, why wouldn't she interview them? They are family.
Delete@5:11 How would others in the family have different viewpoints? How would they teach her acceptance and tolerance? There are millions of people who could teach her that, and none of them are her family.
Delete@10:23. Her books show she has. She alsp lives in California.
Deleteher books are written by a ghost writer
DeleteThey are not opposed to their worldview at all. The fact that Jeremy and Jinger keep talking about 19kac, the family and her life growing up should instead suggest that they are trying their hardest to rehabilitate the family's public image.
DeleteThey should interview Anna. A million views.
ReplyDeleteShe needs to come and visit them, that's how you get on their podcasts.
Delete1:29 5 million! Great idea!
ReplyDelete1:29. You must have ice running through your veins to mock a woman who has been through much sorrow and continues to be a strong loving mother.
ReplyDeleteTo be honest, we don't know what kind of a mom she is behind closed doors, but I certainly hope she's learning and growing through this mess.
Delete@ 8:56 - I think a lot of people are waiting for Anna to speak. She told everyone there was "more to the story" but left it at that. She could sit down with her in-laws for a vlog interview. If not them, who? She could also make a lot of money to support those children if she sold a book. Maybe she could even make enough to get her husband another lawyer. She ought to be speaking to Jinger and Jeremy's writers.
DeleteNothing is going to happen. There's nothing "more" to the story. Josh was proven guilty and Anna needs to accept that and stop pretending there's something that exonerates Josh.
Delete@5:34 We all know that and several judges and courts know that, but what could Anna have possibly been referring to? I'd like to hear her explain what she meant. Would give some insight for sure. Josh seems to think there's more too because he wants another hearing.
DeleteI'm not a lawyer but do know that you have to be very careful with what you share concerning a case/conviction. It can play against you in court. Keep your cards close to your chest. If he was framed,not saying he was,but people have been wrongly convicted before, it will come out eventually.
DeleteHonestly, why would you give a microphone to a person who's serving a sentence in federal prison for CSA? Or to his wife, who has supported him despite every evidence? A judiciously woman would protect her children.
Delete